<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Fri, 25 May 2012 19:59:18 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Blog</title><link>http://www.right2link.org/updates/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:55:50 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-GB</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Online ad agency on blocking search engines</title><dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:48:51 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.right2link.org/updates/2010/2/2/online-ad-agency-on-blocking-search-engines.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">472837:5347356:6528454</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Addvantage Media partners question the soundness of newspapers' thinking in blocking search engines, and give an informative update on the issues we face.</p>
<p><a href="http://technologyweekly.mad.co.uk/Main/InDepth/InternetIssues/Articlex/0001ee0a202246d5bd0b8779af57180a/NewsNow-or-no-news.html" target="_blank">How Murdoch isn risking reducing traffice to his own sites</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.right2link.org/updates/rss-comments-entry-6528454.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Tim Berners-Lee on the Right to Link .... from way back as 1997</title><dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:19:32 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.right2link.org/updates/2010/1/21/tim-berners-lee-on-the-right-to-link-from-way-back-as-1997.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">472837:5347356:6390175</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span >Myths are dispelled in this quite <a href="http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkMyths.html" target="_blank">revealing piece of internet history</a> started by Tim Berners-Lee in 1997. It puts the current debates in perspective.</span></p>
<p><span >We tend to forget that search engines - which are what enable us to find interesting web content that we might want to link to in the first place - predate the internet as we know it today . Search engines have evolved in DNA-like fashion from the days of lists maintained by people like Tim Berners-Lee on CERN, to early programs like Archie, the first search program written by a student and Gopher&nbsp; (1991, even I remember that, I hate to admit!) to all the variants we now know today.<br /><br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine</a><br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_search_engines" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_search_engines</a><br /><br /> What the newspapers are doing is tantamount to blocking the lifeblood of the Internet. It is like deliberately introducing thrombosis in an otherwise healthy organism.</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.right2link.org/updates/rss-comments-entry-6390175.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Linking Not Stealing Content</title><dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:33:10 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.right2link.org/updates/2010/1/11/linking-not-stealing-content.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">472837:5347356:6290205</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>This is an IT journalist's persepctive on why seargh engines and aggregators are not stealing content.&nbsp; It gives enough technical background of what search engines and aggregators actually do without boggling the mind of internet users who just want to create, forward and follow links in the way the internet was designed to allow.</p>
<p><br /><a href="http://www.itpro.co.uk/blogs/daveyw/2010/01/09/murdoch-cuts-off-news-nose-to-spite-face/" target="_blank">http://www.itpro.co.uk/blogs/daveyw/2010/01/09/murdoch-cuts-off-news-nose-to-spite-face/</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.right2link.org/updates/rss-comments-entry-6290205.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>An Informed Exposition of the Issues by a PR Professional</title><dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:59:25 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.right2link.org/updates/2010/1/11/an-informed-exposition-of-the-issues-by-a-pr-professional.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">472837:5347356:6289648</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>This is written from the point of view of the PR industry, but the issues of the way old media are coping with the new e-economy landscape has much wider implications to the end users of search engines and news aggregrators - all businesses, organisations and individuals.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/2010/01/11/tribunal-nla-vs-the-world/" target="_blank">NLA vs the World</a></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.right2link.org/updates/rss-comments-entry-6289648.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Fox News Sued For Copyright Infringement; Complaint Mocks Murdoch's Comments On 'Stealing' Content</title><dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 18:15:07 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.right2link.org/updates/2010/1/9/fox-news-sued-for-copyright-infringement-complaint-mocks-mur.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">472837:5347356:6278722</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The double standard of arguments against linking have been exposed as Fox argues fair use in exactly the same way search engines and news aggregators argue for fair use.&nbsp; Here's the <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20100108/1446417680.shtml?utm_medium=bt.io-twitter&amp;utm_source=direct-bt.io&amp;utm_content=backtype-tweetcount" target="_blank">story</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.right2link.org/updates/rss-comments-entry-6278722.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>No Legal basis for hyperlink tax</title><dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:52:22 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.right2link.org/updates/2009/12/17/no-legal-basis-for-hyperlink-tax.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">472837:5347356:6083418</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Meltwater Group, a privately held Norwegian global company committed to disrupting the status quo through novel technologies and a powerful, global sales and distribution infrastructure, looking to the Copyright Tribunal to clarify the issues of hyperlinks being a public amenity.&nbsp; This move makes it clear that what the newspapers are proposing is nothing less than a hyperlink tax!</p>
<p>&nbsp;<a href="http://meltwater.com/en/meltwater-takes-nla-uk-copyright-tribunal-over-proposed-hyperlink-tax">http://meltwater.com/en/meltwater-takes-nla-uk-copyright-tribunal-over-proposed-hyperlink-tax</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.right2link.org/updates/rss-comments-entry-6083418.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Linking is NOT violation of copyright</title><dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:05:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.right2link.org/updates/2009/12/5/linking-is-not-violation-of-copyright.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">472837:5347356:6017170</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black;">David Drummond, Senior VP and Chief Legal Counsel of Google, denying that Google violates any rights by linking when it uses headlines and a summary to flag up news articles on publicly available sites:<br /><br /><em>"This is not a question of Google not respecting copyright. This is a fundamental disagreement when you're applying copyright rules on the web," he said, adding that the idea that indexing sites was a violation "<strong>flies in the face of how the web has been built and how it operates.</strong>"<br /><br /><span style="color: black;"><br /><a href="http://www.wan-press.org/article18339.html">Full text of David Drummond speech</a></span></em></span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.right2link.org/updates/rss-comments-entry-6017170.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The digital bill is also perceived to hold hidden threats</title><dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.right2link.org/updates/2009/11/24/the-digital-bill-is-also-perceived-to-hold-hidden-threats.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">472837:5347356:6028398</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The threat of badly thought through legislation surrounds many aspects of the digital economy, and will affect life as it is lived on the internet.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8374732.stm" target="_blank">Protests grow over digital bill</a></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.right2link.org/updates/rss-comments-entry-6028398.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The Register on Walled Garden Searches</title><dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.right2link.org/updates/2008/12/4/the-register-on-walled-garden-searches.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">472837:5347356:5991982</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black;">The realistic prospect of "walled garden" searches gets given a beating by The Register in these two articles.<br /></span><br /><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/03/ms_google_bribes_nixed/">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/03/ms_google_bribes_nixed/</a><br /><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/27/bing_google_murdoch/">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/27/bing_google_murdoch/</a><br /><br /></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.right2link.org/updates/rss-comments-entry-5991982.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>
